Interesting experience with the seller of a business defaulting on their post-close deal covenants. The individual failed to deliver physical property in a condition as defined in the purchase agreement. Given the nature of the transaction, there was a multi-stage feature that was required to finance and ultimately close the deal.
We find ourselves in a precarious position where we own and operate the assets entirely, yet the seller has a substantial obligation to us and will not assign an agreement to buyer as agreed to. First time experience this type of behavior. Outside of litigation, what tools have people used to get delinquent and non-cooperative person to behave rationally?
Seller Default
by a searcher from The University of Michigan - Stephen M. Ross School of Business
More on Searchfunder
Searchfunder is an online community and toolkit for searchfunds. Over 80% of those involved in searchfunds maintain a Searchfunder.com account to help them network, problem solve challenges, and keep up with the industry.
We maintain partnerships with database providers that make searching more effective, efficient and affordable along with features that help searchers find deals and investors and vice versa.
We maintain partnerships with database providers that make searching more effective, efficient and affordable along with features that help searchers find deals and investors and vice versa.
The only way to accomplish this outside of litigation (or threatened litigation) is to hold money back. How was the deal structured? Was there an escrow? You could hold back any escrows owed. Was there an earn out baked into the purchase price? You could also consider the seller in breach of the purchase agreement and hold back any earn out. If the full purchase price was already paid and the seller walked away, litigation is probably the best route. You can do this with a lighter touch through a demand letter. Happy to discuss further --@----.com