Question 1. Are there any standard terms for a self funded search? e.g. how much equity would the manager get (vs. the standard 25% in a funded search)? How do traditional search fund investors react to a "soft agreement" with a self-funded searcher? Theoretically, investors' risks are way lower due to a) no funding for the search period, which is the biggest risk, and b) longer management experience of a proven manager. This leads me to believe that the terms for the manager should be much better than 25%. Any thoughts?
Question 2. A typical acquisition multiple is 4-5x. In my target geography & industry PE acquisition multiples are 10X on average. Is it wrong to assume that one can acquire at 5X a company below the PE radar (say $1.5m EBITDA) then grow it overtime to a larger company that would become interesting for Private Equity (say $3-5m EBITDA) and, therefore, apply an average 10x exit multiple as per industry & geography standards?
Self-Funded Search Model & Exit Multiple
by a searcher from Northwestern University - Kellogg School of Management
More on Searchfunder
Searchfunder is an online community and toolkit for searchfunds. Over 80% of those involved in searchfunds maintain a Searchfunder.com account to help them network, problem solve challenges, and keep up with the industry.
We maintain partnerships with database providers that make searching more effective, efficient and affordable along with features that help searchers find deals and investors and vice versa.
We maintain partnerships with database providers that make searching more effective, efficient and affordable along with features that help searchers find deals and investors and vice versa.
304 views
11 comments
Sign in to see all replies.
Create an account.