Say a business has $1M EBITDA, but is dependent on a set of machinery or vehicles that require periodic replacement at an average cost of $300K per year. Businesses like this seem to consistently be listed by brokers at 4-5x EBITDA, with no "discount" given for the necessary recurring CapEx. Are these businesses just overpriced? Or is it standard to ignore that cost when valuing the business? Obviously the answer will vary somewhat by industry, but this seems to be the norm across a range of industries.
More on Searchfunder
Searchfunder is an online community and toolkit for searchfunds. Over 80% of those involved in searchfunds maintain a Searchfunder.com account to help them network, problem solve challenges, and keep up with the industry.
We maintain partnerships with database providers that make searching more effective, efficient and affordable along with features that help searchers find deals and investors and vice versa.
We maintain partnerships with database providers that make searching more effective, efficient and affordable along with features that help searchers find deals and investors and vice versa.
Run DCF on cash flow. That is the only way.
I ran 10% CapX vs. 30% CapX on a base case It took me 10 sec0nds to do the following sensitivity analysis.
Results are as follows for reduction in multiple for a business with 10% vs. 30% CapX.:
a) 18% reduction in multiple if new CapX can be externally financed 75% (meaning 25% is funded from operations).
b) 28% reduction in multiple if 100% of new CapX is funded from operations.
There are many other variables. You can download the software from www.BVXpress.com. Or call me and we will do a live valuation on Zoom of your specific case###-###-#### .