I keep shifting between going down the self-funded and traditional search and there's one thing that bothers me - deal size. I want to buy a company, not buy a job, and I want a management team under me.
I know that commonly it is said that self-funded searchers tend to target / end up with smaller businesses, whilst traditional searches target larger companies ($30m rev, $3-5m EBITDA).
Assuming the self-funded searcher has built an investor network, received 'letters of available capital' in exchange for right of first refusal, and kept investors regularly updated/ engaged during the###-###-#### month search.
As such Isn't the only difference between a self-funded and traditional search where the search money comes from (savings vs. investors), which would mean that both can technically target the same deal sizes with similar success? Or am I missing something?
Deal Size - Self-funded vs. Traditional

by a searcher from INSEAD
More on Searchfunder
Searchfunder is an online community and toolkit for searchfunds. Over 80% of those involved in searchfunds maintain a Searchfunder.com account to help them network, problem solve challenges, and keep up with the industry.
We maintain partnerships with database providers that make searching more effective, efficient and affordable along with features that help searchers find deals and investors and vice versa.
We maintain partnerships with database providers that make searching more effective, efficient and affordable along with features that help searchers find deals and investors and vice versa.
413 views
6 comments
Sign in to see all replies.
Create an account.