Deal Analysis on a Mechanical Parts Distributor

searcher profile

March 02, 2024

by a searcher from Boston University in Boston, MA, USA

Dear Community,

I am seeking insights and advice on analyzing a potential acquisition of a mechanical parts distributor. Below are the key details of the target company, including financials and operational aspects. Any guidance or thoughts on this matter would be immensely valuable.

Target Company Overview:

Key Points:

Inquiries:

  1. Is basing the purchase price on verifiable revenue (CC + Check) minus expenses to calculate EBITDA a secure approach for determining the offer?
  2. What methods are recommended for verifying cash transactions (e.g., trial periods, probationary periods, escrow holds)?
  3. Does the substantial, verifiable inventory value offer additional security for the deal? (That is, should I be taking the inventory into account such as follows - if target is making $1M in verifiable EBITDA and has $2M in verifiable inventory, should I feel golden if acquiring for $4.5M even though $4.5M represent a 4.5x valuation based on EBITDA alone).
  4. In this case, could the negotiation terms (e.g., seller financing, revenue-based contingencies, interest only periods) be more critical than the purchase price itself? (overall, extra financing will represent a minor increased expense in the big picture but putting more down may pose a higher risk burden to buyer if acquisition fails).
  5. What deal structures would be advisable for this acquisition?
  6. Are there other critical factors or risks that should be considered in this analysis? What have you done in similar situations?

Thank you in advance for your valuable insights and recommendations on proceeding with this acquisition.

2
4
73
Replies
4
commentor profile
Reply by an investor
in Los Angeles, CA, USA
Is the inventory $4-5M or $2M? Or they're saying only half is "verifiable?" Either way the size of the inventory relative to the annual revenue concerns me. It seems the inventory is turning over at a rate of only about###-###-#### times per year? This could indicate a large percentage of the inventory is stale or effectively obsolete, especially if it includes parts for older equipment models that are gradually phasing out of use. Parts for older models can be a valuable offering for a parts business, but the valuation of such inventory should reflect the current market demand, not the original purchase cost. Many parts businesses build up their inventory over decades, often realizing the perceived value only when it's time to sell the business. Beyond just valuing the present inventory though, I'd want to know if carrying such a large inventory is necessary to grow the business. This could make any future growth a capex challenge. Could very well be that the business needs far less inventory than they currently have. Ideally you'd verify this is the case, and then not pay for the extra inventory. Or, at the very least, pay the seller for the stale inventory on a consignment basis. And include an expiration date of that stale inventory when you'd be allowed to dispose of it. Feel free to DM me to discuss in detail how you could evaluate the true inventory needs. There are ways to do this even with an outdated inventory system. I've owned and operated multiple parts distributors.
commentor profile
Reply by a lender
from Eastern Illinois University in 900 E Diehl Rd, Naperville, IL 60563, USA
There is a lot to digest here in this post. You also express a pretty broad range on the EBITDA. We help clients by doing a free analysis on deals from a financing perspective and we would be happy to sign an NDA and review the financials and provide more specific feedback. It is hard to do it without seeing the details from year-to-year. Feel free to reach me at any time redacted if we can be of any assistance.
commentor profile
+2 more replies.
Join the discussion