Would you let the employees of the target co-invest in the deal ?
April 05, 2019
by a searcher from INSEAD in Liège, Belgium
What are your thoughts on letting the existing management of the target company co-invest in the deal ? Would you recommend it? Do you have alternative incentive strategies to suggest instead (traditional annual bonuses, phantom equity, options...).
from University of Canberra in Perth WA 6000, Australia
1) What context are you running? Is it purely to help you fund the acquisition? Lock in talent? Make for an easier transition? to make you feel more confident? etc.
I agree with Joseph in that you need to be really sure that the existing staff are aligned to your vision. So many times they are still attached to the previous owner.."but Harry would have done it this way..." In many ways you have to acknowledge the spirit of the previous owner in a respectful way and at the same time exorcise their ghost from the place.
2)Capability: are you locking in the skills needed for now or for where you want to take it? How would you feel if you locked people in only to pivot the organisation to a totally different focus? If you've locked in irrelevant capability you are applying a handbrake to success.
In terms of structuring a lock in it depends on your jurisdiction and the pros and cons associated with different models. In Australia we need to be careful as there are some specific tax laws here that make things tricky if its not thought through with the right legal and financial advice at hand.
from University of Canberra in Perth WA 6000, Australia