Working to buy

searcher profile

September 26, 2019

by a searcher from University of Houston in Houston, TX, USA

I have seen few posts where the buyer works for few months in the company that he would like to buy. I believe this could be highly beneficial for seller and buyer because you able to evaluate in depth if there is a good match. Please share if you have been involved in such kind of transactions. How common are they? What kind of contract or LOI is signed?


3
5
185
Replies
5
commentor profile
Reply by a searcher
from California State University, Los Angeles in Beverly Hills, CA, USA
Seems a little dated, but I will respond for those reading. I basically had done this. It didn't work out -- A little on my part and a little on the owners part. Here are some thoughts:

If you are going into this situation, you need to spell it out clearly that you are the president and you are looking to better the company. Therefore, you are now the de facto owner of the company. Decisions need to be agreed upon, before any employment contract is signed, and explicitly stated how they will happen. Moreover, you will need free reign over all aspects of the business - Meeting clients, suppliers, etc. You are to be at every meeting and take the reigns.

I made a few mistakes, and those are some of them. The owner wouldn't give up their control over the sales, which is one of the things that led to my parting ways. I am very methodical in how I do sales and I began micro managing the national sales manager, wanting to know exactly what kind of activities, contacts, and other metrics. The COO and owner told me to be nicer and let the owner do this job. That was a mistake.

I also made the mistake of not coming in with a specific plan to follow. I let the owner dictate how the mentoring and transition was going to look like. This was going to be the company I was going to run, so I should've entered as though I was running it - not the other way around.

The owner was very hesitant to implement many of my ideas. This company was literally from the 1970s. They had about 4 type writers and triplicate copies of everything. Each had its file that had back up on back up. So, I learned how to do business from the 1970s. However, I wanted to modernize everything and digitize everything. The issue is that the owner would constantly say, "that doesn't work, we've tried it". When digging deeper, when they tried it, the .pdf's would come up too slowly on their computer, where the paper files were readily accessable. I asked when they tried implementing digitization###-###-#### So, yeah, pdf's would've loaded much slower back then.

So, have a clear plan put in place, have it written out, go in as if you are the boss, and expect pushback from the owner. I would say that having an owner out within 3-6 months would be best, depending on the reason why they are leaving and the type of person they are. That said, it may be essential to have them on for a full year and have them transition their relationships to you. But, you are coming in as the CEO/Owner... That is a MUST.
commentor profile
Reply by an intermediary
from Wake Forest University in Winston-Salem, NC, USA
Flip side of this is that it is a huge potential risk to the seller up front as most sellers want the mere fact that they are considering selling to stay confidential until after the sale is completed. When word gets out that a company is considering selling, employees get unnecessarily worried (and may leave), vendors get anxious (and can even put the company on COD), and competitors have been known to fan the flames with rumors. If you bring the buyer in under false pretenses, terrible foot for the buyer to get off on with the staff. Then let's say it doesn't work out for reasons totally unrelated to the business -- then the staff and others think there must be something wrong with the company...
commentor profile
+3 more replies.
Join the discussion