Work with a lawyer who focuses on closing the type of deals you want to do

professional profile

January 09, 2026

by a professional from University of Michigan - Ann Arbor in Detroit, MI, USA

In my line of work, every once in a while, opposing counsel is a large law firm. The outcome is always the same. A recent case in point: Last year I helped a client with a minority investment. He operates a small business. His business partner wanted out. An investor wanted in. The investor had one of the largest law firms in the country representing him. While our proposed documents were clean and efficient, their redlines were not. And it was clear that a junior associate was responsible for a lot of the mark up. - Meaningless legalese was added. - Immaterial changes were made to defined terms. All this created friction. And while friction may not always kill a deal (and didn’t in this case), it can kill a deal under the wrong circumstances. Worse, I can only imagine that the junior associate was being billed out at close to $1,000 / hour. Maybe more. Do yourself a favor, work with an experienced and credentialed lawyer who focuses on closing the type of deals you want to do, be it me or someone else. Because big law is great for big transactions. But main street is a different animal.
4
5
89
Replies
5
commentor profile
Reply by a professional
from Emory University in Washington, D.C., USA
Like all professional services...yes, make sure that the support matches the need. There are so many individual and smaller legal/accounting/diligence shops to support this type of transaction. Also, geography can sometimes matter for a transaction, so don't think that the big firm will by definition know that. it can sometimes take that smaller group to make a difference!
commentor profile
Reply by a searcher
from Universidad Panamericana in Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
Totally agree. The right advisory team makes or breaks a deal. Just saw opposing counsel nearly kill one over hyper-formalistic share certificates. ?
commentor profile
+3 more replies.
Join the discussion