WHAT IS ACCEPTABLE VERSUS A DEAL BREAKER REGARDING DILIGENCE FINDINGS?

Assuming things always get uncovered during diligence that you don't want to see (i.e. bad for buyer).



I am curious what are some general rules of thumb / your framework on deciding whether something negative you uncovered during diligence is acceptable and hence you would move the deal forward versus unacceptable that would lead you to end the deal /get out of the deal?




share: