Under what circumstance would you use debt to finance your acquisition?
August 14, 2020
by a searcher from HEC School of Management, Paris in Bristol, UK
The Harvard and Stanford search models typically reference a hybrid financing approach - equity + debt + seller note. As I speak to more folks, I am learning that many acquisitions are also done entirely using various types of debt (asset financing, invoice discounting, etc) and seller earn outs.
Has anybody raised the acquisition capital to buy without equity, (i.e. using entirely debt)? What have you found to be the pros and cons of this approach, and what ratios/metrics would you need to look at to assess whether the deal would make sense in the long term? Also, how would you deal with the lack of obvious candidates for a company board to give advice if you carry no investors?
Sorry for the numerous questions!
from California State University, Sacramento in Seattle, WA, USA
from Yale University in Moscow, Russia
From a seller standpoint, why the hell they will sell it if they can just leverage it in the same way as you would do, get the money in their hands and at the same time also keep the business in their hands? From the bank standpoint, why they would give money to someone to acquire a business w/o them having any skin in the game?
Debt to equity ratio varies across the countries, but in general searchers make acquisitions with 20-80% being debt and the rest being equity of various forms (part of which sometimes might be structured like debt for tax reasons).