What do lenders require from investors for the equity injection?
Imagine you’re in a situation where you’re looking to acquire a business, and the lender has determined that you need an additional $193,000. You’ve got $100,000 in personal cash that’s ready to go, but you’re still short by about $93,000. Now, you’re wondering if a contribution from a non-seller-note investor could cover this gap, especially since there’s no seller standby note in play and you’re within the limited-source cap. I’ve come across some discussions about using minority-investor equity for the limited portion, but I’m really interested in hearing from lenders who have actually approved such structures. What kind of terms and documentation did they require from the investors? Specifically, how did they handle issues like ownership and control, guarantees, distributions, repayment rights, and any restrictions on equity funded by the injection? Additionally, I’m curious if lenders insist that the unlimited-source portion must come from the buyer’s own funds or if another qualifying source is acceptable. If you’re a lender or capital provider who has experience with these accepted structures, or if you know an investor or group that considers these contributions, I’d love to hear from you. Please feel free to reply or send me a DM. It’s important to note that this is a general inquiry, and no specific business, seller, or live deal is involved.