Is GovCon Being Discounted Due to Uncertainty?

March 04, 2025

by a searcher from University of Virginia-Darden - Darden School of Business in Washington, DC, USA

Curious how others are evaluating GovCon opportunities in today’s climate. Are deals being heavily discounted due to uncertainty?

Would love to hear thoughts on structuring—are more deferred or contingent payments the best approach, or is it better to avoid these deals altogether?

2 Likes

18 Replies

131 Views

Replies

Reply by a searcher
from University of Virginia in Washington, DC, USA

Appreciate the insights shared here! I agree with the overall cautious stance. Shifting spending priorities create an environment where contracts can be delayed, canceled, or scaled back. Discretionary contracts—especially those deemed "non-essential" (producing reports, research, coaching, or other artifacts) or misaligned with the administration’s priorities—are particularly at risk. That said, I’m curious how this will impact small businesses and set-asides in an era where cost is king and margins are being compressed. Will we see a breakup of large contracts, leading to greater fragmentation and opportunities for SMBs that provide agile, affordable, outcomes-focused work? Or will consolidation favor mid-sized and larger companies that can offer the absolute lowest cost through scale?

Reply by an intermediary
from Babson College in Boston, MA, USA

GovCon is a very broad “industry” and the response to this topic is heavily dependent on the product/service, customer, contract profile etc.
With that said, each deal involving government contracts should be assessed for exposure to reduced funding in future periods.
If the contracts are a matter of convenience vs necessity likely a higher risk. If geared towards defense, likely less risk vs say humanitarian aid mobility efforts.
I’d also argue there’s likely higher risk for an industry newcomer vs an established business expanding its footprint with more contracts.

+16 more replies.

Join the discussion