Individual-tied licenses with new SBA rules
September 24, 2025
by a searcher from University of Maryland at College Park in Austin, TX, USA
I know there are quite a lot of posts about this, but they all seem to be over a year old, so I wanted to see if there are fresh thoughts, considering the new SBA SOPs from the summer. Also considering that HVAC seems to be having a particular heyday in ETA*.
How does everyone think about businesses that have licenses tied to the seller and their specific trade experience? Easy solutions are to give a qualifying employee % to stay on and be the qualifier... but that trips some wires with the new SBA rules, no?
Another path is to provide enough incentive to an employee (without equity) to stay on as qualifier long enough for the buyer to become licensed. But depending on the specific industry, is that really reasonable?
My understanding is that typically, if someone is a qualifying individual for a license they typically are in business for themselves (or will very soon want to be).
I've had individual-tied licenses as a deal breaker, but I'm thinking there has got to be a way that people make it work. Otherwise, they wouldn't be so incredibly popular.
*I know HVAC has ALWAYS been the poster child for ETA. But it's hitting different right now. Or maybe that's just me.
in San Antonio, TX, USA
from The University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, MI, USA