Holdback in Escrow outside APA - Need Advice

March 17, 2026

by a searcher from Carnegie Mellon University in Livingston, NJ, USA

I am acquiring a business via an asset purchase. Post-signing, the business has deteriorated, and we are trying to structure a holdback of ~$200k–$250k without reopening the APA or triggering lender re-underwriting, in the last minute. The current idea is: - Seller receives full proceeds at closing - Seller then places $250k into escrow under a side agreement - Funds are released if revenue recovers within 9–12 months - If not, funds are returned to me I need your help to understand: 1. How is this treated for the seller, are they taxed on the full proceeds at closing regardless of escrow? 2. If the escrow is returned to me, is that treated as a purchase price adjustment (basis reduction) or taxable income? 3. Does structuring this as escrow vs seller note vs contingent payment materially change tax outcomes? 4. What structure would best preserve purchase price adjustment treatment and avoid unintended income recognition? 5. Are there risks with the IRS recharacterizing this if not properly documented? I want a structure that is clean, defensible, and does not create surprises post-close. Please provide your input, or comment if you can help.

Reply by a professional
from Loyola College in Maryland in St. Louis, Missouri, United States

thanks for the tag ^redacted‌. Great comments here already. Not much to add other than this: stepping back from the tax mechanics, situations like this usually raise a broader deal question around re-underwriting the risk. When the facts change between signing and closing, it’s important not to let sunk cost or deal fatigue drive the decision. If the downside case no longer works, better to face that clearly now than paper over it with structure.

Reply by a searcher
from University of Wisconsin in United States

This sounds not good. First, if the company is a falling knife, an escrow is likely not the answer. Backing out is likely a better solution. Second, I believe the concept of a side agreement does not fly with the SBA. I'm not an expert, but I believe this could be considered loan fraud. I would consult with a lawyer.

+10 more replies.

Join the discussion