Funding SBA Deals When Real Estate is Worth More Than the Business

searcher profile

February 19, 2025

by a searcher from University of California, Santa Cruz in Austin, TX, USA

Hi Search Funder Community,

Question for y'all about raising equity when real estate is in the transaction.

I'm in discussions on multiple deals where RE is worth ~60% of the total transaction value. Ive sorted out the bank financing for this situation (SBA extended amortization, 504, pari passu if needed). However, for the purpose of raising equity to fund the deal, it is not clear to me the optimal playbook & capitalization structure when using investor equity.

In other words, have y'all had success in raising that (ideally~10%) equity with the same investors under a valuation of EBITA multiple + Real Estate or do I need to plan to treat this as 2 fundraising activities with different investor bases ie Business Equity (EBITA multiple) & Commercial Real estate (cap rate, etc)?

I do have experience with real estate transactions and know investors specializing in both these categories. That said it feels like a lot of complexity to introduce the need to close 2 funding rounds simultaneously. Same goes for sale-leaseback as a 3rd option (which from my understanding only works well with large deals or very undervalued real estate).

TLDR i'd love to hear from folks whom have successfully gotten these deals done and how they made it happen.

Thank you!

6
30
256
Replies
30
commentor profile
Reply by a lender
from University of Missouri in St. Louis, MO, USA
Dan, the real estate variable is one that a lot of banks like since it increases the loan amount. Also there is a higher demand on the secondary market for loans with that amortization (v. the business only 10 year) so there is a bank financial incentive in addition to you getting the 25 year amortization. However, broadly speaking here are the questions to ask yourself:

1. is the real estate important to the business? Would it be better to move down the road to a different space or is the location/infrastructure/zoning relevant to the success of the business?

2. Do you want to own the real estate? Some business owners always want to own and others have no interest. If you have to buy the building but you don't want to keep it, you could do a sale leaseback and lessen your need for down payment.

3. Do you want to maximize the amortization, or decrease the capital injection? You could buy just the business and have a lease to own opportunity on the CRE. If you are an existing business buying the building, you don't have to put any money down, 100% financing on the building. Buying the building 6-12 months after acquisition would mean you don't have to raise any capital

4. Would you be able to buy the business without needing funds from investors? if so then lease to own makes even more sense since you would keep 100% ownership?

My opinion is that you should only buy real estate in an acquisition if you feel like it is vital to the business, have a desire to own real estate, and overall feel like it is a net benefit. A lot of people buy buildings b/c the financing is easier. That can be dangerous, especially if you end up buying the business and finding out the building isn't optimal for your vision of the company's future.
commentor profile
Reply by a lender
in Ponte Vedra Beach, FL 32082, USA
^redacted‌ While I specialize in SBA & USDA lending, within my structuring of projects, I do see buyers structure their projects with the CRE acquisition timed at a post transition date, maybe 6+ month post closing so the company & new ownership can structure RE acquisition on company merit solo where it is an expansion with prospective 100% financing, or with###-###-#### %. Happy to discuss in more detail, my cell is###-###-#### , my email is redacted or please feel comfortable scheduling directly via my Calendly below; https://calendly.com/bturner-thebancorp/45min‌
commentor profile
+28 more replies.
Join the discussion