Founder / Owner Transitions & Key Man Risk

professional profile

February 19, 2026

by a professional from University of Central Florida in Atlanta, GA, USA

Sharing some thoughts and observations after working alongside sponsors who have diligenced and acquired platforms and small businesses where the founder was a key man risk. The smaller the company, the more elevated these issues can be. The most common problem I see is that the founder is the system of record. The SOPs are in their head. What's on paper isn't followed to the T, and a lot of day-to-day decisions are held for founder signoff: pricing calls, vendor issues, customer escalations. Stuff they don't even think of as "their job" because it's been muscle memory for 20 years. The other piece is relationships. The top customers aren’t necessarily calling the founder every day (hopefully), but when issues arise, the founder is the fixer. Same with key vendors and subs. That's not a CRM issue, it’s more of a two-way trust issue where the founder steps in because it’s easier than delegating. Think “if you want something done right, do it yourself”. Then there's the team. Employees in these businesses are loyal to the founder, not exactly the org chart. When a new operator walks in, everyone is wondering how this impacts them. Is their job safe? What’s going to change? And will they like the new culture? A major goal for the new operator is to win the confidence and trust of the team, because losing a key person or two in first few months can turn a learning quarter into a rebuilding year. So what does year one actually need to look like for the new operator? A few things stand out to me: Institutionalize the founder's tribal knowledge. Not just what they do, but how they think when they make decisions. That thought process is what the new operator needs to replicate. Push decision-making down to the staff where it belongs. A lot of these businesses have capable people who've just never been empowered to act without a green light from the top. Run a deliberate relationship handoff with key customers and vendors, the ones where founder is very present. Not an email intro, real face time with the founder by your side. (If possible) If you're working through a deal where the founder transition is the piece you're trying to figure out, happy to compare notes. Feel free to DM me.
2
10
98
Replies
10
commentor profile
Reply by a searcher
in Raleigh, NC, USA
One thing that I think doesn't get enough attention in ETA circles is the mental turmoil sellers go through post-sale. Having been through it a couple times now, I'm definitely not what I would call an expert, but have helped navigate this more than the average searcher. The process is elation>frustration>reality>mourning>regret>re-identification>acceptance. This process looks different each time and the severity and height of peaks/depths of valleys for each stage seem to be determined by how those experiences are interpreted in relation to past trauma. We now have built into our process, time for the seller to step away post-sale, regardless of what is needed for the transition. We also have resources for the sellers (counseling, finance, etc) to help them cope and plan.
commentor profile
Reply by a professional-advisory
from Wilfrid Laurier University in Toronto, ON, Canada
Great post. The tribal knowledge piece is huge. Ask a seller what they do and they'll give you maybe 20% of it. The rest is muscle memory they don't even know they're doing. That's where the real risk is. And the relationship handoff needs way more than an email intro. A customer who's been calling the founder for 15 years doesn't just switch over. That takes real time together. Good stuff.
commentor profile
+8 more replies.
Join the discussion