Hi all! Just want to understand when investors are open to undertake an acquisition laying an EBITDA below 12-14% (under what is normally expected at purchase in SF model) but in which there are some other interesting opportunities upon capital structuring or some operative improvement. What would you consider the most for analyzing this kind of deal?
More on Searchfunder
Searchfunder is an online community and toolkit for searchfunds. Over 80% of those involved in searchfunds maintain a Searchfunder.com account to help them network, problem solve challenges, and keep up with the industry.
We maintain partnerships with database providers that make searching more effective, efficient and affordable along with features that help searchers find deals and investors and vice versa.
We maintain partnerships with database providers that make searching more effective, efficient and affordable along with features that help searchers find deals and investors and vice versa.
I consider EBITDA margin as a "guideline", not as a "financial driver". Anyone who teaches otherwise is missing the fundamentals of finance.
Example: A hawker goes to the bazar and buys fruits for 100. He sells them off at the end of the day nets 101. A profit margin of 1%. He repeats this every day. At the end of the year, he has his original investment of 100 plus profit of 365. His margin on sales is 1%, but ROI is 365%. Is this business bad or good?
I had heard this from my father at age 10 but did not appreciate it even though I had MBA (U of C) and Sr. management experience with a Fortune 500. It was after 10 years as an M&A Intermediary and teaching at Kellogg that I began to appreciate the wisdom of what my father said. I now analyze the fundamental "business model" of a business and not any specific metric.
Just like low margin business can be a good business, the opposite is also true. That is, a high margin business sometimes is more risky.