I am looking at using an SBA loan to acquire a 25+ year old commercial cleaning company that was last sold 2 years ago. Organized as S-corp. Seller pushing for stock purchase agreement due to large number and type of contracts and fleet of vehicles. Lower middle market. Working with an attorney already, but his advice is just to avoid SPA, and I'm looking for solutions. He suggested purchasing as 336(e) held by an LLC treated as a disregarded entity.
Seller is open to 338(h)(10)/336(e) special election, so that solves the depreciation problem.
I am trying to figure out a way to get around the liability issue of 25+ years of unknowns under the same S-Corp, and most of that under a prior owner I can't even talk to.
Looked into TLPE insurance (micro R&W), but it seems like a policy would only cover the period of###-###-#### back to last sale).
Is there protection through doing an F-reorg or other entity conversion? Or is the only way to shed liability at sale time through APA?
Am I just overestimating the risk profile here? Or do you guys just treat it like driving into a roundabout, close your eyes and hope for the best?
Feedback on limiting liability in stock purchase 336(e) or similar
by a searcher from Purdue University
More on Searchfunder
Searchfunder is an online community and toolkit for searchfunds. Over 80% of those involved in searchfunds maintain a Searchfunder.com account to help them network, problem solve challenges, and keep up with the industry.
We maintain partnerships with database providers that make searching more effective, efficient and affordable along with features that help searchers find deals and investors and vice versa.
We maintain partnerships with database providers that make searching more effective, efficient and affordable along with features that help searchers find deals and investors and vice versa.
An APA doesn't automatically absolve you of all potential successor liability, and an SPA doesn't automatically expose you to all such liabilities. Either an APA or SPA can accommodate tailored provisions that allocate post-closing liability to meet the needs of the parties.. What is your counsel's reasoning for avoiding an SPA? I've heard many non M&A lawyers take this position reflexively, but experienced M&A counsel can help you explore the potential liability issues and draft either document to allocate risk/liability as agreed between you and seller. With appropriate/acceptable indemnification and escrow (or other mechanisms), the stock purchase your seller seeks may indeed be preferable for you, in part to avoid the time, expense and risks associated with transferring individual assets, rehiring employees, etc.
On a side note, if you're counting on a 338h10 or 336 to drive the economics of your transaction, be sure to have your counsel do thorough diligence to ensure that a past action has not compromised the S status, and of course ensure that your transaction structure does not bust the S election.