Exploring Development Partnership models: A Call for Insights
June 19, 2024
by a searcher from The University of Queensland - UQ Business School in Hong Kong
In the complex world of JVs (development partnerships), particularly within industries like mining and the extractives industry, the collaboration between two parties can take various forms. One common arrangement sees Party A offering the tenement/mineral-resources, while Party B brings in the necessary capital or funding. In some cases, both parties then join forces to provide technical and operational expertise. Refer to BHP, Rio, Vale, Glencore for examples on this.
Such partnerships can unlock significant value, but they also come with their own set of challenges and complexities. As such, I'd like to reach-out to fellow searchfunders who may have navigated these waters (in a different industry perhaps) to share their unique experiences.
Pitfalls to Watch Out For
Risk Imbalance: Often, one party may bear a disproportionate amount of risk.
Control Issues: Deciding who has the final say can lead to conflicts.
Cultural Misalignment: Differences in corporate culture can hinder smooth operations.
Advantages Worth Celebrating
Resource Optimization: Combining assets and expertise can lead to greater efficiency. Shared Expertise: Two heads are better than one when solving complex problems. Financial Flexibility: Access to capital can accelerate project timelines. Considering Alternatives
Joint Ventures: Could a more formalized joint venture structure mitigate some risks?
Hybrid Models: Are there innovative models that blend different forms of collaboration?
I'd love to get your thoughts on the pros and cons, potential alternatives, or hybrid models that have worked for you. Your insights could help illuminate the path for others facing similar decisions.
What has been your experience?