Exploring Buyer Representation for Non-Operating Trade-Secret Infrastructure Asset

intermediary profile

January 29, 2026

by an intermediary from Southern New Hampshire University in Gillette, WY, USA

I’m currently evaluating interest around a non-operating infrastructure asset structured as a trade-secret / hybrid framework. This is not an operating business, product, or SaaS offering. There are no customers, revenue, or codebase at this stage. The asset consists of non-public architectural and governance frameworks intended to control and coordinate system behavior at scale. As conversations mature, I’m exploring whether to bring in a buyer-side representative to manage structure, negotiation, and efficiency once interest crystallizes. This is not a request for mass outreach or listings, but for selective conversations with individuals experienced in non-operating assets or trade-secret transfers on a success-based basis. Formal legal structuring would occur post-alignment. This remains exploratory and confidential.
0
5
73
Replies
5
commentor profile
Reply by an intermediary
from University of California, Santa Barbara in Los Angeles County, CA, USA
Got it. This sounds like two different problems. One is discovering who actually has a use case and mandate for a non-operating asset like this. The other is deal execution once that interest exists. In my experience, the first is the real constraint. If there is a real pull from the right buyer, structure and representation will sort themselves out.
commentor profile
Reply by an admin
from Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Portland, OR, USA
^redacted might be able to help ^redacted‌ find the right Buyer Representation for his Non-Operating Trade Secret Infrastructure Asset. If you know someone that can help, please tag them here (Shift 6).
commentor profile
+3 more replies.
Join the discussion