reply
by a lender
2w ago
from Eastern Illinois University
in 900 E Diehl Rd, Naperville, IL 60563, USA
Great question. We are a Commercial Loan Brokerage and we provide acquisition financing but also do traditional business financing as well. I will do my best to answer these questions based on what we see in the market.
1. Did lender appetite improve materially after the first close? - Once you have a business under management and can show experience, it takes a lot of the risk off the table for lenders. But the true answer really depends on what type of financing you are looking for. If you are using SBA financing and have room in the SBA limit to do another deal, then yes, it is much easier to execute your second deal. If you are moving to conventional or non-bank financing, it can be more challenging. There is a bit of the gap in the lending market. For deals that fit the SBA criteria, there are plenty of lenders. For deals $30 million in debt and above, there are investment banking divisions at major banks. For deals in the $5 to $25 million size range, you typically do not find very many banks with active M&A teams. So the size could pose some difficulties. But even with that said, if you already have a successful operation under your belt, that will help make it easier.
2. Were you able to refinance and pull some equity back off the table? - Unfortunately there really is no such thing as a "cash-out" refinance with a business. Unlike real estate where lenders regularly will do "cash-out" (although even that has gotten more restrictive) and put cash back into the pocket of owners, that does not happen with businesses. With real estate the value does not tend to change as much or as quickly, and cash flow tends to be more stable, which is why lenders get more comfortable doing cash out for real estate. For businesses you can refinance existing debt or get debt to fund growth, but you cannot get cash out. Usually you would pull cash out in the form of salaries, distributions, or via the sale of equity to other individuals. As for just a debt refinance, we do debt refinances all of the time. Again, it depends on what product you are using. If you start with an SBA 7A loan, the terms are much more generous then what most conventional banks offer, so you may need to get the debt paid down over a few years to be in a position where moving to a conventional lender would make more sense. If you are moving the debt from a more expensive lender to another, the more success you have operating the business and the stronger the business balance sheet, the easier it will be to refinance the debt for a better interest rate. Some choose to refinance from conventional debt into a non-bank / SBIC lender because the repayment terms are more valuable and to get capital to grow. Sometimes you can take some chips off the table with a non-bank / SBIC lender if they are willing to buy into the business. But again, that is not really "cash-out" and is a sale of equity.
3. Did the personal guarantee requirement change at all after you had a track record? - It is not necessarily track record that impacts the personal guarantee. It is more deal size and the type of lender you are working with. SBA loans require personal guarantees 100% of the time for any 20% or greater owner. Most commercial banks and credit unions in their loan policies require personal guarantees on loans below a certain level for any owner with between a 15% and 25% ownership interest (depends on each lender's policy). Usually loans below $15 to $20 million require a guarantee depending on the institution. Exceptions can always be made depending on the strength of a transaction (available collateral, higher DSCR, strength of the corporate balance sheet, leverage ratios, consistency of cash flows, etc.), but generally speaking most commercial banks and credit unions on smaller deals still look for a guarantee. For your non-bank lenders, including SBIC lenders, personal guarantees usually are not required. But you are at much lower leverage and much higher debt costs typically with these lenders.
4. In hindsight, was it better to push for leverage upfront, or close with a safer structure and optimize the capital stack later? - If your goal is to eventually get more leverage on the business, then you would want to maximize that up-front as you typically cannot get "cash-out" in the future like stated above. However, I always recommend putting more money down and structuring deals to minimize risk as much as possible, and sometimes that requires more cash down to make the deal work. If you have the cash available, you could also choose to minimize your down payment but keep the cash available if issues come up in the future, versus putting all of your cash into the deal and not having any funding available for a rainy day. If the business starts under-performing and the financial support is not there, it will be almost impossible to get additional leverage at that point, at least not anything affordable or potentially without having to give up equity.
If you have additional questions about commercial financing I am happy to get on a call to discuss at any time. You can reach me here or directly at redacted Good luck.