Hello,
I'm looking at buying a small parking lot maintenance business in Canada.
The business has capital leases that the seller isn't looking to pay-off as part of the stock transaction.
However, the seller is adding back the principal and interest payments on the lease to get to SDE.
Would I be correct in thinking that these should not be added back to SDE since they are real cash expenses required to operate the business?
I am thinking, alternatively, that if the seller paid off the capital leases in full at the time of closing, then the interest and principal expenses on those leases would then cease when I take over. In this scenario, the seller would then be reasonable in adding-back the lease payments to SDE because the business is truely being sold on a debt-free basis.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Capital Leases in an equipment-heavy deal
by a searcher from Queen's University
More on Searchfunder
Searchfunder is an online community and toolkit for searchfunds. Over 80% of those involved in searchfunds maintain a Searchfunder.com account to help them network, problem solve challenges, and keep up with the industry.
We maintain partnerships with database providers that make searching more effective, efficient and affordable along with features that help searchers find deals and investors and vice versa.
We maintain partnerships with database providers that make searching more effective, efficient and affordable along with features that help searchers find deals and investors and vice versa.
I looked at many asset heavy businesses myself when I was searching. You need to consider why the seller is reinvesting so much money into the equipment. Is his business expanding so his equipment expense is unusually large? What is a reasonable annual budget for replacing equipment at normal operations under the current volume of business? What is the average equipment life in the industry (hint call the equipment manufacturer and ask them about the machinery)? These are just some of the questions you need to ask, and clearly understand to properly evaluate the deal.
Also, since the equipment expense can be quite large many asset heavy businesses get evaluated based on EBIT and 5x is the equivalent of 4x EBITDA in most cases. If 5x EBIT and 4x EBITDA produce vastly different valuations I would be very cautious.