Calling Australian Searchers - a conversation on the landscape...

 profile

February 22, 2026

by a searcher from Monash University in Melbourne VIC, Australia

I'm an Aussie whose been living in South Africa for about 6 years, and am planning on moving back, and searching there. I've run various businesses over the years, and in the last 6 months, have been looking at building a holdco (in South Africa, but due to the move now, Australia). I have a couple of questions about the landscape there -- let's get a discussion going... 1. Regarding debt funding: I understand the banks are typically quite conservative. Most say they want personal collateral (i.e. real estate) to back any debt, particularly for a first acquisition, and will not typically fund >70% of the transaction with debt. It's the same in South Africa - the banks are EXTREMELY conservative here. We were, however, offered 2.5X debt to EBITDA by a big bank, on a deal we were working on here, which was about $2.5m AUD. I had to sign a personal guarantee, but had very little collateral on my personal balance sheet at the time -- so it was just for 'Skin in the game', not actual coverage. The way I got them to fund this was by putting together a world class board of directors, who all had tiny (1-2%) amounts of equity in the project, and would advise me. If I was a solo/traditional searcher, they would not have funded it. I also had the seller roll 20% equity, so the banks observed reduced risk by virtue of the sellers remaining involved. Would it be reasonable to think I can employ the same structure to achieve a near 100% LBO acquisition in Australia? Or is a cash/equity injection of >40% pretty much mandatory to get our first deal done there? 2. Regarding industry and consolidator competition: I am debating between a roll up (to exit), or building a long-term holdco of unrelated companies (a legacy project). It's clear that PE has sunk its teeth into most of the industries that make sense for a roll up - everything from assisted living, to body piercing shops. Does this make a non-PE backed roll up a waste of time? I would assume pretty much any business in these 'roll-up-able' industries would be snapped up immediately. Looking instead at the idea of building a holding company of unrelated businesses... would the consolidator/PE competition be significantly less, making these deals doable at 2-4x ? The mental debate I am having is whether to cast a very broad net, and just look for amazing, unrelated businesses to buy, or to do a roll up. My fear is - we attempted a veterinary roll up for 2.5 years in South Africa. There were only ~250 acquirable practices, and 2 other consolidators in the market. Too much competition, not enough opportunity meant that things moved incredibly slowly. I had reached out to every one of those 200 clinics multiple times, and found that I was actually spending most of my time twiddling my thumbs, waiting for responses etc. from the sellers, with not enough work to actually fill my time. Then, when an opportunity would arise from an interested (off-market) seller, they would also speak to the other consolidators to understand what they could offer, and would inevitably go with them as they could offer more. Is there still space for non-PE backed roll ups in Australia?
1
9
157
Replies
9
commentor profile
Reply by a searcher
from The University of Chicago in Melbourne VIC, Australia
Dimitri - first of all thanks for the post and if you’re back in Melbourne hit me up for coffee! @luke thank you for the tag. My 2 cents: On financing - all anecdotally: - For smaller self-funded deals typically you’ll likely end up dealing with small business loan sections in the bank who insist on PGs and yes RE collateral is a real thing that makes the difference. If investors are directors they’ll need to sign the PG as well. - For larger (>10M ish) deals it appears you fall in a different category in terms of how the bank treats the deal and you seem to be able to get away with not having PGs. - Banks are becoming less and less conservative with 50, maybe 60% for the traditional and hearing 70 ish for the Judo types - The investor pool in Aus that is acquainted with search is small. - This “more difficult” financing landscape (compared to SBA in the US) has probably also contributed to lower multiples, yes in that 2-4 range. On roll-ups etc: - Australia is definitely behind other parts of the world in terms of what’s hot to roll up, but then again PE is not really looking at deals <5-10M. - I believe that the size of the market and the differing legislation from state to state (for example in HVAC, etc) makes it harder than the US to take roll up as a principal strategy. - Hearing clinics is definitely overdone with multiples in or close to double digits. - Interested to hear other people’s thoughts on what’s heating up at the minute
commentor profile
Reply by a searcher
from Columbia University in Brisbane QLD, Australia
Hi Dimitri, my experience is that NAB will lend 50% of goodwill and then up to 80% on physical assets. Would love to know if others have achieved more? My experience here is that multiples tend to go up with EBITDA. So, if you have the energy, you're better off doing a series of smaller rollups of building a portfolio of businesses, than going big on one.
commentor profile
+7 more replies.
Join the discussion