This came up in my convo with a couple folks in the roll-up world.

When rolling up 10+ companies within 24 months, what's the best corporate structure?
Add'l context: In each child company, the seller specifically wants to stay on and continue to operate with significant upside 20-49%, which allows the core team to focus on M&A and integration.
Slightly unusual in that the play wouldn't necessarily have one platform + bolt-on's but rather a hub-and-spoke model.

Option 1: Each child company is structured as its own entity siloed from the others, where the cap table has the HoldCo entity own 51-80%. This allows each seller to "eat what they kill" as they continue to operate/build their companies. It would mean that each child company would have its own reporting that flows up to the parent company.

Option 2: Each child company is owned wholly by the parent company, and the sellers would get a piece of the parent co. This would simplify the cap table since you wouldn't have a different cap table for each child company. But it would require you to frequently re-evaluate internally your parent company's value as you add-on.

Would invite feedback from folks who's thought about this/experienced this firsthand!