At What Point Does Pre-IP Infrastructure Become a Real Buy-Side Asset?

intermediary profile

January 29, 2026

by an intermediary from Southern New Hampshire University in Gillette, WY, USA

Question for experienced buyers/operators: In traditional search and buy-and-build models, most diligence focuses on existing revenue, customers, and operations. I’m curious how others here evaluate pre-IP, non-operating infrastructure assets—specifically governance, licensing, and control-layer architectures designed to sit above future acquisitions or platforms. For buyers who’ve seen this done well: – What signals indicate real transferability and durability before IP or code exists? – At what point does this shift from “concept risk” to “infrastructure leverage”? Interested in perspectives from operators, sponsors, or advisors who’ve encountered this layer in practice.
0
7
88
Replies
7
commentor profile
Reply by a professional
from George Washington University in Raleigh, NC, USA
Thanks for the tag, ^redacted‌. ^redacted‌, I am an IP attorney, so I've seen this from the legal side on behalf of my clients buying or selling businesses. Generally, most buyers and investors are looking for some right to exclude others and created a limited market monopoly for the goods/services offered. This can be a lot of things, but the value starts with assessing each asset and its strength to exclude competition. This could be a patent, copyrighted work, trademarked brand, government contract, exclusive license in a field, or many other things. Happy to discuss in confidence at redacted
commentor profile
Reply by an intermediary
in Charlotte, NC, USA
Short answer is when the IP becomes defensible. Could be patents but might include customer contracts. If you can go to court and argue that the IP is a tangible asset, it's an asset. Until then, in my experience, it's just an idea. And ideas are easy.
commentor profile
+5 more replies.
Join the discussion