At the heart of every business acquisition is one legal question:

September 22, 2025

by a professional in Windermere, FL 34786, USA

If you do absolutely nothing, and the business sustains exactly as-is, will the investment still work? Most buyers don’t frame it this way. They get caught up in upside growth initiatives, new contracts, marketing, cost savings. But if the baseline business can’t service the debt, cover management comp, and operate without heroic assumptions, the deal isn’t safe. This is where good lawyering matters. Our job isn’t just to paper a transaction. It’s to stress test the deal through the legal lens, purchase price adjustments, working capital mechanics, earnout structures, indemnities, covenants. We identify where the legal terms either reinforce the downside protection or quietly erode it. Upside is optional. Downside protection is mandatory. That’s why sophisticated buyers rely on their lawyers to keep their legal structure aligned with their financial underwriting. If you’re acquiring in the lower middle market, you want counsel that thinks like an investor, not just a lawyer.

Reply by a professional
from American University in Irvine, CA, USA

Thank you for the tag, Luke Tatone! I agree with Eric's assessment, and would also add that careful attention to the way the transaction is structured is also necessary, to protect against future liability if the acquisition doesn't sustain itself, as creditors, employees ad other stakeholders may bring claims against the failed "business", and it is important to be able to insulate the buyer, as much as possible, from successor liabilities if the target goes south after the Closing, especially if the roots of that downfall existed prior to the Closing but went undetected or undisclosed.

Reply by an admin
from Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Portland, OR, USA

^redacted might be able to contribute to this legal discussion.

Join the discussion